City Council and Centre City Redevelopment Reach Compromise Over Convention Center Debt

During a council meeting last February, city councilmembers acting as the Redevelopment Agency requested that Centre City Development Corporation (CCDC) return in March to discuss a plan that the corporation take over the $228 million in debt owed on a previous expansion of the convention center.

At a March 29 city council meeting, CCDC vice president Frank Alessi said the $9.2 million annual payments, increasing to $13.7 million in 2013, would clean out CCDC's coffers.

"We reviewed the financial capability of the agency and determined that if the agency were to pay the full debt service on the convention center...there will be no money available for projects after fiscal year 2013."

According to Alessi, assuming the $9.2 million annual payments would leave the downtown development corporation with only $3.8 million to spend on projects, city services, and CCDC administration.

So, Alessi suggested a compromise, that CCDC be put on a "stepped-up" payment plan, paying $2 million in 2012 and increasing each following year by $500,000 until the debt is paid off in 2043. Even on this payment plan, Alessi said CCDC would be forced to cut $3.25 million in public-art projects for five years and spend $7 million less on land acquisitions through 2014.

City council liked Alessi's plan.

"Cutting off redevelopment and shutting down these projects would be extremely shortsighted," said councilmember Kevin Faulconer. "To turn that off would be the wrong place to go."

"We could shift priorities around at CCDC and we could make the full payment, [but] I'm going to accept compromise. This compromise will help the city, and it's not going to bankrupt CCDC," said councilmember David Alvarez.

Faulconer presented a motion supporting the "stepped-up" payment alternative. That motion passed seven-to-one, with Sherri Lightner opposed.

Share / Tools

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • AddThis
  • Email

More from SDReader


Does this mean that the CCDC has to make the stepped up payment, that they have to actually pay the $2 Million more than they were going to if the City Council hadn't passed this? Or does it mean that the City has told them that they would like for them to do this. Is there like a bill, like your water bill to the CDC? And when do they have to pay?

Nostalgic: CCDC will begin making the payments next fiscal year. And, CCDC would not have had to pay the debt if council/redevelopment agency had not brought the proposal forward.


The next step is for the CCDC to try to figure out how to wiggle out of paying the $2 MILLION they were told to pay. It will be interesting to see when that first payment is made, the first check written. That would be the real start of a new San Diego.

Log in to comment

Skip Ad

Let’s Be Friends

Subscribe for local event alerts, concerts tickets, promotions and more from the San Diego Reader