Anchor ads are not supported on this page.

4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs

What's next for Union-Tribune real estate?

Mission Valley boom won't be without lawsuits

Union-Tribune building in Mission Valley
Union-Tribune building in Mission Valley

The fate of Doug Manchester's U-T San Diego property in Mission Valley appears to up in the air, literally, as an environmental rights group has threatened to sue the City of San Diego and Manchester if greenhouse gas emissions are not accurately recorded and reduced, as required by California law.

On Tuesday, September 15, the city council will decide whether to overturn approval of Manchester's proposed 12.86-acre conversion of what is now San Diego's daily newspaper headquarters to a mixed-use residential and commercial mixed-use development.

In June of this year, the Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation (CERF) appealed the San Diego Planning Commission's approval over claims that the city failed to use accurate greenhouse-gas emission estimates and instead fudged the numbers to save Manchester, and other developers, from having to perform any air-quality mitigation measures.

If the council refuses to grant the appeal, the environmental foundation’s attorneys have indicated a lawsuit could follow.

Here Comes the Boom

The planned development of the Union-Tribune parcel, located south of Fashion Valley near Friars Road, is one of many projects slated for Mission Valley. According to numerous city reports, Mission Valley and surrounding communities are expected to bear the brunt of a forecasted population surge in coming decades. One such forecast, the 2050 Regional Growth Forecast (conducted by the San Diego Association of Governments), predicts the city's population will swell to just under 2 million by 2050 from what is now estimated at 1.3 million.

Sponsored
Sponsored

In response, city planners and developers have focused their sights on centrally located areas near transit and other public services. Mission Valley is among those communities. Massive mixed-use projects such as Civita, Archstone, and others have already begun. More are planned, including the long-talked-about expansion of the Town and Country Resort, located next to the Union-Tribune property. With development sure to come, environmental rights groups are watching closely, ensuring the city follows all environmental laws.

Something in the Air

In regards to their appeal of the Union-Tribune development, CERF attorney Livia Borak and executive director Marco Gonzalez objected to air-quality numbers used in the project's environmental reports.

In a June 17, 2015, letter, Borak and Gonzalez accused the city of failing to recognize the actual increase of greenhouse-gas emissions as a result of the project moving forward as planned. In addition, they objected to allowing Manchester to build without addressing those issues.

"Unless the [environmental impact report] analyzes the project's true impacts against the existing environment, it will fail to comply with [the California Environmental Quality Act]. CERF urges the city to consider its role in reducing [greenhouse gas] emissions as a local entity with land-use authority. Unless the City complies with the [Assembly Bill 32], Scoping Plan, Executive Order S-3-05, Executive Order B-30-15, and CEQA, the [draft environmental impact report] will not withstand judicial scrutiny."

But the city is sticking to its guns. In an August 25, 2015, memo, an employee for the city defended the environmental report in regards to future emissions.

Senior planner Jeffrey Szymanski said the city used a baseline of zero greenhouse-gas emissions for the environmental report because the Union-Tribune’s printing plant will no longer be used and the new buildings will be located on what are now undeveloped areas of the property.

As for greenhouse-gas emissions, the city's environmental report estimates 1983 metric tons of carbon dioxide will seep into the environment. That number, wrote Szymanski, will be offset, however, by 722 metric tons in reductions from clean car and energy efficiency laws already on the books. The reduction amounts to 36.4 percent, far below the state-mandated 28.3 percent that California state law requires. As a result, Manchester can forego performing additional mitigation measures. According to the letter, the formula used by the city was referred to as the "business-as-usual scenario."

Business as Usual

Attorney Borak, however, attacks that business-as-usual approach. The so-called 722 metric tons in reductions should have already been factored in, meaning the law currently requires that the fuel and energy reduction measures be implemented and should not be identified as mitigation measures.

Borak says the business-as-usual approach will get the city, and its residents in trouble.

"The developer hasn’t agreed to do anything. That’s why there’s no mitigation," writes Borak in a September 10 email. "The baseline the city used is the project without energy and fuel reduction measures. This is crazy because those regulatory measures are already in place. In other words, there’s no way the project could be built without these reductions. It would be illegal. Nonetheless, that’s what the city calls business as usual and that’s what the city uses as baseline. The city and consultant then calculated the project as it will be built in reality. But that’s not a reduction. That’s just reality."

The council will hear the appeal on Tuesday September 15 during council's afternoon session.

Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Previous article

2024 continues to impress with yellowfin much closer to San Diego than they should be

New rockfish regulations coming this week as opener approaches
Union-Tribune building in Mission Valley
Union-Tribune building in Mission Valley

The fate of Doug Manchester's U-T San Diego property in Mission Valley appears to up in the air, literally, as an environmental rights group has threatened to sue the City of San Diego and Manchester if greenhouse gas emissions are not accurately recorded and reduced, as required by California law.

On Tuesday, September 15, the city council will decide whether to overturn approval of Manchester's proposed 12.86-acre conversion of what is now San Diego's daily newspaper headquarters to a mixed-use residential and commercial mixed-use development.

In June of this year, the Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation (CERF) appealed the San Diego Planning Commission's approval over claims that the city failed to use accurate greenhouse-gas emission estimates and instead fudged the numbers to save Manchester, and other developers, from having to perform any air-quality mitigation measures.

If the council refuses to grant the appeal, the environmental foundation’s attorneys have indicated a lawsuit could follow.

Here Comes the Boom

The planned development of the Union-Tribune parcel, located south of Fashion Valley near Friars Road, is one of many projects slated for Mission Valley. According to numerous city reports, Mission Valley and surrounding communities are expected to bear the brunt of a forecasted population surge in coming decades. One such forecast, the 2050 Regional Growth Forecast (conducted by the San Diego Association of Governments), predicts the city's population will swell to just under 2 million by 2050 from what is now estimated at 1.3 million.

Sponsored
Sponsored

In response, city planners and developers have focused their sights on centrally located areas near transit and other public services. Mission Valley is among those communities. Massive mixed-use projects such as Civita, Archstone, and others have already begun. More are planned, including the long-talked-about expansion of the Town and Country Resort, located next to the Union-Tribune property. With development sure to come, environmental rights groups are watching closely, ensuring the city follows all environmental laws.

Something in the Air

In regards to their appeal of the Union-Tribune development, CERF attorney Livia Borak and executive director Marco Gonzalez objected to air-quality numbers used in the project's environmental reports.

In a June 17, 2015, letter, Borak and Gonzalez accused the city of failing to recognize the actual increase of greenhouse-gas emissions as a result of the project moving forward as planned. In addition, they objected to allowing Manchester to build without addressing those issues.

"Unless the [environmental impact report] analyzes the project's true impacts against the existing environment, it will fail to comply with [the California Environmental Quality Act]. CERF urges the city to consider its role in reducing [greenhouse gas] emissions as a local entity with land-use authority. Unless the City complies with the [Assembly Bill 32], Scoping Plan, Executive Order S-3-05, Executive Order B-30-15, and CEQA, the [draft environmental impact report] will not withstand judicial scrutiny."

But the city is sticking to its guns. In an August 25, 2015, memo, an employee for the city defended the environmental report in regards to future emissions.

Senior planner Jeffrey Szymanski said the city used a baseline of zero greenhouse-gas emissions for the environmental report because the Union-Tribune’s printing plant will no longer be used and the new buildings will be located on what are now undeveloped areas of the property.

As for greenhouse-gas emissions, the city's environmental report estimates 1983 metric tons of carbon dioxide will seep into the environment. That number, wrote Szymanski, will be offset, however, by 722 metric tons in reductions from clean car and energy efficiency laws already on the books. The reduction amounts to 36.4 percent, far below the state-mandated 28.3 percent that California state law requires. As a result, Manchester can forego performing additional mitigation measures. According to the letter, the formula used by the city was referred to as the "business-as-usual scenario."

Business as Usual

Attorney Borak, however, attacks that business-as-usual approach. The so-called 722 metric tons in reductions should have already been factored in, meaning the law currently requires that the fuel and energy reduction measures be implemented and should not be identified as mitigation measures.

Borak says the business-as-usual approach will get the city, and its residents in trouble.

"The developer hasn’t agreed to do anything. That’s why there’s no mitigation," writes Borak in a September 10 email. "The baseline the city used is the project without energy and fuel reduction measures. This is crazy because those regulatory measures are already in place. In other words, there’s no way the project could be built without these reductions. It would be illegal. Nonetheless, that’s what the city calls business as usual and that’s what the city uses as baseline. The city and consultant then calculated the project as it will be built in reality. But that’s not a reduction. That’s just reality."

The council will hear the appeal on Tuesday September 15 during council's afternoon session.

Comments
Sponsored
Here's something you might be interested in.
Submit a free classified
or view all
Previous article

Top Websites To Buy Instagram Likes + Bonus Tip!

Next Article

SDSU pres gets highest pay raise in state over last 15 years

Union-Tribune still stiffing downtown San Diego landlord?
Comments
Ask a Hipster — Advice you didn't know you needed Big Screen — Movie commentary Blurt — Music's inside track Booze News — San Diego spirits Classical Music — Immortal beauty Classifieds — Free and easy Cover Stories — Front-page features Drinks All Around — Bartenders' drink recipes Excerpts — Literary and spiritual excerpts Feast! — Food & drink reviews Feature Stories — Local news & stories Fishing Report — What’s getting hooked from ship and shore From the Archives — Spotlight on the past Golden Dreams — Talk of the town The Gonzo Report — Making the musical scene, or at least reporting from it Letters — Our inbox Movies@Home — Local movie buffs share favorites Movie Reviews — Our critics' picks and pans Musician Interviews — Up close with local artists Neighborhood News from Stringers — Hyperlocal news News Ticker — News & politics Obermeyer — San Diego politics illustrated Outdoors — Weekly changes in flora and fauna Overheard in San Diego — Eavesdropping illustrated Poetry — The old and the new Reader Travel — Travel section built by travelers Reading — The hunt for intellectuals Roam-O-Rama — SoCal's best hiking/biking trails San Diego Beer — Inside San Diego suds SD on the QT — Almost factual news Sheep and Goats — Places of worship Special Issues — The best of Street Style — San Diego streets have style Surf Diego — Real stories from those braving the waves Theater — On stage in San Diego this week Tin Fork — Silver spoon alternative Under the Radar — Matt Potter's undercover work Unforgettable — Long-ago San Diego Unreal Estate — San Diego's priciest pads Your Week — Daily event picks
4S Ranch Allied Gardens Alpine Baja Balboa Park Bankers Hill Barrio Logan Bay Ho Bay Park Black Mountain Ranch Blossom Valley Bonita Bonsall Borrego Springs Boulevard Campo Cardiff-by-the-Sea Carlsbad Carmel Mountain Carmel Valley Chollas View Chula Vista City College City Heights Clairemont College Area Coronado CSU San Marcos Cuyamaca College Del Cerro Del Mar Descanso Downtown San Diego Eastlake East Village El Cajon Emerald Hills Encanto Encinitas Escondido Fallbrook Fletcher Hills Golden Hill Grant Hill Grantville Grossmont College Guatay Harbor Island Hillcrest Imperial Beach Imperial Valley Jacumba Jamacha-Lomita Jamul Julian Kearny Mesa Kensington La Jolla Lakeside La Mesa Lemon Grove Leucadia Liberty Station Lincoln Acres Lincoln Park Linda Vista Little Italy Logan Heights Mesa College Midway District MiraCosta College Miramar Miramar College Mira Mesa Mission Beach Mission Hills Mission Valley Mountain View Mount Hope Mount Laguna National City Nestor Normal Heights North Park Oak Park Ocean Beach Oceanside Old Town Otay Mesa Pacific Beach Pala Palomar College Palomar Mountain Paradise Hills Pauma Valley Pine Valley Point Loma Point Loma Nazarene Potrero Poway Rainbow Ramona Rancho Bernardo Rancho Penasquitos Rancho San Diego Rancho Santa Fe Rolando San Carlos San Marcos San Onofre Santa Ysabel Santee San Ysidro Scripps Ranch SDSU Serra Mesa Shelltown Shelter Island Sherman Heights Skyline Solana Beach Sorrento Valley Southcrest South Park Southwestern College Spring Valley Stockton Talmadge Temecula Tierrasanta Tijuana UCSD University City University Heights USD Valencia Park Valley Center Vista Warner Springs
Close

Anchor ads are not supported on this page.